Many workers are concerned about what the energy transition means for them and their communities. While a vast majority of people believe the energy transition will have an impact on their industry and community, only about half of them think that this impact will be a positive one, according to our Workforce Attitudes to the Net Zero Transition 2024 survey, which polled over 1,500 semi-skilled workers around the world across sectors most exposed to the green transition and gauged workers' appetite for reskilling as part of the transition to net zero.
According to Gallagher's research, around 70% of employees say that their employer hasn't communicated the potential impact of the energy transition on employees' future employment. And workers identify hurdles that will need to be overcome in order to consider alternative job prospects.
Eight-six percent of respondents cited financial concerns and/or a lack of job opportunities as their main barriers to reskilling, according to the Workforce Attitudes to the Net Zero Transition 2024 research. And only 39% felt it was likely that they would receive social and financial protection from their employer as part of the move to clean energy. This is particularly marked in North America where 50% of employees regarded it as unlikely that they would receive employer assistance.
Why a Just Transition Matters
Gallagher takes an in-depth look at how to prepare the workforce for net zero and support a more seamless transition toward a green economy.
VIEW REPORT
It's clear that many people are worried about what's to come and what they should do about it. But it's less clear where any help will come from.
Three-fifths of employees believe that government bears the primary responsibility for providing social and financial protection to workers who may be affected because of the clean energy transition, while 40% say it's their employer's responsibility.
Governments, by providing protections such as healthcare, retirement and employment benefits, can proactively support workers and their communities as they adjust to the loss of jobs in heavy emitting "smokestack industries," such as shipbuilding, steel and coal.
As our research indicates, such backstops are deemed essential by those on the frontlines. Respondents told us that financial concerns and a lack of employment opportunities were their biggest barriers to reskilling.
However, there's a disparity between workers' views on what financial support should be made available to support the transition of jobs and their real-world expectations.
More than half of employees think it's unlikely they'll receive social and financial protection from the government during the transition. Fewer still — just 45% — expect to receive any form of financial safety net from their employer.
But this lack of protection is a missed opportunity. Our research suggests that employers that offer reskilling and social protection solutions for workers impacted by the transition would benefit from a boosted sense of loyalty among their employees.
This finding is particularly true in India and Brazil, where 66% and 56% of workers, respectively, said they would feel more positive towards their employers if they offered support in reskilling for jobs in the green economy.
However, respondents think that employers are falling short when it comes to providing guidance, support and communication on this important subject, with almost seven in ten workers claiming that their employer hasn't communicated the potential impact of the energy transition on employees' future employment.
Employers in sectors exposed to transition-related job losses have a range of social protection measures at their disposal, including:
These kinds of measures could be brought together under a coherent workforce transition plan designed to mitigate social and labor impacts, with planning ideally beginning well before labor layoffs actually occur.
Employers in sectors most exposed to the energy transition might want to be thinking about what mechanisms may be needed today to futureproof their workforce for tomorrow.
"Although renewable energy is the way forward, there is a timing issue between closing a factory and having alternatives in place in the renewable and care sectors," says Bert de Wel, climate policy officer for the International Trade Union Confederation. "This can lead to social issues. Therefore, social protection systems can act as a backstop for orderly transitions. Countries should begin implementing these systems now."
View all articles in this series
Published December 2024
